🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has declared it is claiming damages amounting to $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This action represents a direct response from the Kremlin against plans to utilize frozen Russian sovereign funds to aid Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

Based on accounts in local news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the stated $230 billion demand.

European Union officials will determine in the coming days regarding a proposal to use around €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. This scheme entails providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its defence and financial needs.

Most of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution serves as the primary custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

European Union authorities have maintained that their plan is on solid legal ground. Their position is based on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, even though it was immobilized in European countries shortly after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

Moscow, in contrast, has labeled any utilization of the assets as theft. Authorities have threatened retaliatory measures, such as seizing European private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a prominent role in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its funds. He added that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Strategic Positioning

With statements seen as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the assets plan as "a vicious attack on the right to ownership and the international reserves system created by the United States."

Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. The institution has previously stated it is facing over 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although courts in EU countries are unlikely to enforce rulings from Russian tribunals, experts anticipate Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, provided that relevant assets can be located," stated a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities said they are developing steps to deter other countries from aiding any Russian legal action against EU companies. They are also designing safeguards to shield EU countries with assets in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

Under the detailed scheme, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would stay unaffected.

Kyiv would solely be obligated to repay the loan if and when Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense destruction inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

Belgium, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an different approach for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU borrowing to fund a loan, using unallocated funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, described the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, meaning it doesn't come from our public funds, which is also important," she remarked. "It also delivers a powerful signal that if you cause all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."